.png?width=109&height=108&name=Pharma%20(2).png)
.png?width=111&height=108&name=Medical%20Devices%20(2).png)
.png?width=84&height=107&name=IVD%20(2).png)
.png)
Share
The introduction of a new product into your company’s portfolio may require expanding your existing laboratories or even building a new laboratory to support additional testing requirements for process controls and batch release.
When analyzing and testing products produced in a GMP environment, qualification of laboratory equipment is a mandatory aspect to comply with regulations (e.g. FDA, EMA). Laboratories need many different types of laboratory equipment to perform their basic QC activities, and therefore qualification of this equipment can seem like a daunting task.
It is best to specify a qualification strategy for the use of all types of equipment to avoid unnecessary qualification activities: a risk-based qualification approach to determine what qualification activities are required for each piece of laboratory equipment.
In this blog post, we will address a few key considerations and challenges that may arise during the qualification of your laboratory equipment.
Defining the necessary qualification effort: risk-based approach
Using the (right) Pharmacopeia
After determining an appropriate qualification approach, it is important to consider the various requirements in the pharmacopeia. The pharmacopeia describe:
- qualitative and quantitative composition of medicines
- the tests to be carried out on medicines
- the raw materials used in the production of medicines
- the intermediates of synthesis
As mentioned, the User Requirement Specification (URS) documents all user-specific requirements for the equipment. This includes installation, operation and performance requirements, as well as documentation requirements (e.g., Standard Operating Procedures, Work Instructions). As part of the qualification, pharmacopeia requirements must be listed in the URS.
Depending on the exporting country, different pharmacopeias may apply to laboratory equipment. The different pharmacopeias that may apply are (not an exhaustive list):
For example, the test requirements for pH measurements are described in USP <791> and Ph. Eur. 2.2.3. This means that these requirements must be taken into account when qualifying a pH meter and demonstrated during qualification.
Conclusion
When introducing new laboratory equipment for analytical testing of GMP products, qualification is mandatory to comply with various regulations (e.g. FDA, EMA). To avoid unnecessary qualification of simple laboratory equipment, a risk-based qualification approach should be followed.
When qualifying computerized lab equipment, ISPE GAMP 5 might be a good guideline to follow since complex firmware and/or software needs to be qualified. Also, a data integrity assessment should be performed to comply with EMA Eudralex Volume 4 Annex 11 and FDA 21 CFR part 11.
Certain analytical tests must meet different pharmacopeia requirements depending on the export area (e.g., Europe, the U.S., Japan, and China). These requirements must be taken into account when qualifying laboratory equipment.
New to qualifying laboratory equipment? Or do you need advice? Our experts will be happy to help you with the best validation program in accordance with your available resources. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
