Why validate your computerized systems?
The Agile model in CSV
The V-model in CSV
Validation according to the Agile model
GAMP 5 framework for agile development
|
To validate agile development processes according to GAMP 5, organizations must follow the framework’s five-phase approach:
SpecifyThe delivered description of system functionality is provided by the list of completed agile artifacts, such as epics and user stories, taken directly from agile software development tools. |
Configure and/or codeIn this step, the supplier relies on its expertise to implement the customer’s requirements. All functionalities documented in the previous steps are implemented. |
VerifyVerify that the software meets user requirements and design specifications through testing and other validation activities, such as peer reviews and code inspections. |
ReportDevelop a design specification that describes how the software will be designed, including the software architecture, data model and interfaces. |
In agile development, these 5 phases are typically conducted in iterative cycles, with each cycle resulting in a working software increment. At the end of each cycle, the software increment is validated to ensure that it meets the user requirements and design specifications.
Special considerations when using the Agile model
Integral part of the development process
In an agile environment, validation must be an integral part of the development process, with validation activities performed in each sprint. This approach allows validation to be built into the development cycle, rather than being an afterthought or bottleneck.
One way to achieve this is by using automated testing tools that can validate functionality quickly and reliably. Automated testing tools can be integrated into the development cycle, allowing testing to be performed automatically after each code change.
Documentation
Another important consideration when validating computerized systems in an agile environment is documentation. Regulatory requirements typically require that computerized systems be documented thoroughly, including requirements, design, testing, and maintenance.
In an agile environment, documentation should be incorporated into the development cycle, with documentation updated in each sprint. Documentation should be clear, concise, and easy to understand, allowing developers, testers, and stakeholders to understand the system’s functionality and validate that it meets the specified requirements.
Communication
Communication is also essential when validating computerized systems in an agile environment. Agile development emphasizes collaboration and communication, and this applies to validation as well.
Developers, testers, and stakeholders should communicate frequently, with regular feedback loops throughout the development cycle. This approach allows issues to be identified and addressed quickly, reducing the risk of delays or failures.
Validation strategy
Finally, it’s important to establish a validation strategy and plan before starting development. The validation strategy should outline the validation approach, including the scope, objectives, and acceptance criteria.
The validation plan should provide a roadmap for validation activities, including testing, documentation, and communication. These documents should be updated throughout the development cycle, reflecting changes in the system’s functionality or regulatory requirements.
Conclusion: use GAMP 5 and the Agile model to your advantage
Validating agile development processes in regulated industries requires a risk-based approach that considers the unique challenges and complexities of agile development.
The GAMP 5 framework provides a structured approach to validation that can be applied to agile development processes, enabling organizations to develop high-quality software products that meet regulatory requirements and ensure patient safety. By following the five-phase approach outlined in GAMP 5, organizations can validate their agile development processes – following the Agile model – whilst being compliant.
In conclusion, validating computerized systems following the Agile model requires a proactive and collaborative approach. By incorporating validation into each sprint, using automated testing tools, communicating frequently, and documenting thoroughly, developers, testers, and stakeholders can work together to ensure that computerized systems meet regulatory requirements and are fit for their intended use.
With these best practices in place, organizations can successfully implement agile development methodologies while maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.